Hedging as one of Negative Politeness Strategies in German Languaculture

The article deals with the problem of negative politeness and corresponding politeness strategies in German languaculture on the basis of modern fiction and also elaborates on the analysis of linguistic means of implementation of a negative politeness strategy known as hedging.

Purpose of research: study of communicative situations in which a threat to the negative face of one of the speakers is present, and a review of politeness strategies that are used in such cases. The negative face means the desire of an interlocutor not to be bothered by others during communication (as an example, a request, an order or advice can damage the negative face of the addressee). Special attention is given to hedging as one of the most commonly used negative politeness strategy.

Methods: the practical part of the research is based on a linguacultural analysis of the material.

Results: using the analyzed materials we discover language (including grammatical, lexical and phonetical ones) tools and mechanisms that are used to perform such strategies in a speech act and also reasons to use hedges in communication and their functions in it.

Conclusion: based on the theoretical, practical materials and the results that have been found in the course of the research we can state the importance of mastering (among all the linguacultural features being one of the key components of acquiring any foreign language on a par with grammar, vocabulary, phonetics etc.) the complex and frequently used for a lot of different communicative purposes phenomena known as hedging – one of the negative politeness strategies, that has quite a unique ways of usage depending on languaculture in question, and thus requiring a more deep and thorough studying in each particular case. The relevance of research of that particular element in the system of negative politeness strategies is due to the fact that while acquiring languages of western Europe (German, English and others – that means languages of cultures of an individualistic type) – an incorrect knowledge of hedging mechanisms can be the cause of problems and failures in communication, because in such cultures that element of communicative politeness has quite an important role (more important that in cultures of collectivist type – i.e. the Russian one and others).

1. Gazizov R. A. Princip vezhlivosti v nemeckoj dialogicheskoj rechi (na primere maksim soglasiya i skromnosti) [The principle of politeness in German dialogic speech (by the example of maxims of consent and modesty)]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 2009, no. 7(188), pp. 13-18.

2. Petrova E. M. [Various approaches to the definition of the concept of "hedging" in linguistics]. Aktual'nye problemy lingvistiki: vzglyad molodyh issledovatelej. Sbornik nauchnyh statej [Actual problems of linguistics: a view of young researchers. Collection of scientific articles]. Chelyabinsk, 2019, pp. 111-116 (In Russ.).

3. Dement'ev V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikaciya [Indirect communication]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2006. 374 p.

4. Safier D. Miss Merkel. Mord in der Uckermark. Hamburg. Rowohlt, 2022. 352 p.

5. Bir A. Poslednyaya smert' [A stranger on this earth]. Myunhen, Limes Publ., 2021. 384 p

6. Knobel'sdorf R. A stranger on this earth. Germany, Bastei Entertainment Publ., 2022. 508 p.

7. Gazizov R. A. Sposoby realizacii lingvisticheskoj vezhlivosti v nemeckoj i russkoj kul'turah [Ways of implementing linguistic politeness in German and Russian cultures]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 136-139.

8. Lakoff Dzh. Hedzhi: issledovanie kriteriev znacheniya i logiki rasplyvchatyh konceptov [Hedji: a study of criteria of meaning and logic of vague concepts]. Zhurnal filosofskoj logiki = Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1973, no. 2, pp. 458-508.

9. Zyubina I. A. Aktualizaciya kommunikativnoj strategii negativnoj vezhlivosti i ee taktik (na materiale debatov D. Trampa i H. Klinton) [Actualization of the communicative strategy of negative politeness and its tactics (based on the material of the debates between D. Trump and H. Clinton)]. Baltijskij gumanitarnyj zhurnal = Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 2018, vol. 7, no. 1(22), pp. 69-72.

10. Yarmolinec L. G., Bessarabova N.V., Anisimova O.B. Hedzhing kak sredstvo nepryamoj kommunikacii [Hedging as a means of indirect communication]. Integrirovannye kommunikacii v sporte i turizme: obrazovanie, tendencii, mezhdunarodnyj opyt = Integrated communications in sports and tourism: education, trends, international experience, 2020, no. 1, pp. 186- 188.

11. Baranov A. N., Dobrovol'skij D. O., Mihajlov M. N., Parshin P. B., Romanova O. I. Anglo-russkij slovar' po lingvistike i semiotike [English-Russian Dictionary of Linguistics and Semiotics]. Moscow, 2003. 640 p.

12. Vlasyan G. R., Petrova E. M. Lingvisticheskoe hedzhirovanie kak sredstvo realizacii strategij vezhlivosti v razgovornom dialoge [Linguistic hedging as a means of implementing politeness strategies in conversational dialogue]. Kul'tura i tekst = Culture and Text, 2021, no. 1(44), pp. 216-227

13. Shusharina V. A. Propozicional'noe hedzhirovanie kak sredstvo modifikacii smysla [Propositional hedging as a means of modifying meaning]. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya = The world of science, culture, and education, 2022, no. 1(92), pp. 392-395.

14. Pastuhova O. D. Osobennosti hedzhirovaniya v amerikanskom i rossijskom politicheskom diskursah [Features of hedging in American and Russian political discourses]. Uchimsya ponimat' Rossiyu: politicheskaya i massmedijnaya kommunikaciya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Learning to understand Russia: political and mass media communication. Materials of the International Scientific Conference]. Ekaterinburg, 2018, pp. 213- 215 (In Russ.).

15. Osipov G. A. Hedzhirovanie kak pragmaticheskij instrument politicheskogo diskursa [Hedging as a pragmatic tool of political discourse]. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal. Filologicheskie nauki = International Scientific Research Journal. Philological sciences, 2012, no. 3, pp. 57-59.

16. Sedova A. V. [Hedging in economic texts of the German press]. Lingvokul'turnye aspekty globalizacionnyh processov: sociokul'turnyj kontekst i dinamika rechevyh praktik. Tezisy dokladov II Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii [Linguistic and cultural aspects of globalization processes: sociocultural context and dynamics of speech practices. Abstracts of the II International Conference]. Moscow, 2021, pp. 124-125 (In Russ.).

17. Gorina O. G., Hrabrova V. E. Lingvisticheskij hedzhing kak kommunikativnaya strategiya (v rusle korpusnyh issledovanij) [Linguistic hedging as a communicative strategy (in line with corpus research)]. Vestnik novosibirskogo gosudar-stvennogo universiteta. Seriya: lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikaciya = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2017, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 44-53.

18. Sejranyan M. Yu. Diskursivnye markery rechevogo otgorazhivaniya kak otrazhenie nacional'no-kul'turnoj specifiki rechevogo obshcheniya [Discursive markers of speech exclusion as a reflection of the national and cultural specificity of speech communication]. Prepodavatel'. XXI vek = Teacher. XXI century, 2022, no. 3-2, pp. 380-386.