A Politically Correct Joke: Myth or Reality? (Structural Analysis of a Stand-up Comedy Show)

The article describes the results of structural analysis of a stand-up comedy by the famous British comedian Jimmy Karr to show that political correctness has hardly affected humourous discourse. The study is relevant as it contributes to further linguopholosophic, linguocultural and discursive investigations into political correctness that, according to the authors, contradicts the natural tendency of humans to think in binaries. Stressing that the humorous is based on the binary opposition of Self/Other, the authors question the very chance for a successful joke to be poli tically correct. The theoretical part of the article highlights a number of events that at different times contributed to the evolvement and spread of political correctness, considers the model Self/Other in terms of people’s interaction with the world and with regard to its manifestation in humorous discourse. The methods of structural, discourse and content analysis serve to reveal the linguistic means of representing the opposition Self/Other in contemporary humorous discourse and to identify a number of its elements. The results of analysis show that the growing tendency for political correctness has to some extent affected the thematic aspect of the humorous, however, they give ground to hypothesize that human desire for this kind of jokes will gradually reverse the currently increasing tendency.

1. Ter-Minasova S. G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikaciya [Language and intercultural communication]. Moscow, Slovo/Slovo, 2000. 624 p. Available at: http://vassilenkoanatole. narod.ru/olderfiles/1/ter-minassova.pdf (accessed 01.02.2023).

2. Sharapova I. V., Kobenko Yu. V. Istoriya vozniknoveniya ponyatiya "political correctness" i sposoby ego interpretacii [The history of the concept of “political correctness” and the ways of its interpretation]. Vestnik TGPU = TSPU Bulletin, 2014, 10 (151). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoriya-vozniknoveniya-ponyatiya-political-correctness-isposoby- ego-interpretatsii/viewer

3. O’Neill B. A Critique of Politically Correct Language. The Independent Review, Fall 2011, vol. 16, no. 2, ISSN 1086–1653, Copyright ©2011, pp. 279–291 Available at: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/272354414_A_critique_of_politically-correct_language

4. Evgrafova Yu.A. Lingvokul'turologicheskie osobennosti gendernogo aspekta v yazykovoj kartine mira paremij (na materiale russkogo, anglijskogo, nemeckogo i ital'yanskogo yazykov). Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Linguoculturological features of the gender aspect in the linguistic picture of the world of paremias (based on the material of Russian, English, German and Italian). Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 207 p. EDN QGAOWL.

5. Rudnev V.P. Enciklopedicheskij slovar' kul'tury XX veka: Klyuchevye ponyatiya i teksty [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Culture of the XX century: Key concepts and texts]. Moscow, Agraf Publ., 2009. 543 p.

6. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural Anthropology]. Moscow, AST: Astrel' Publ., 2011. 541 p.

7. Kassirer E. Tekhnika sovremennyh politicheskih mifov [Technique of modern political myths]. Vestnik MGU. Ser.7. Filosofiya = Bulletin of the Moscow State University. Ser.7. Phi-losophy, 1990, no. 2, pp. 58–65.

8. Civ'yan T.V. Model' mira i ee lingvisticheskie osnovy [The world model and its linguistic foundations]. Moscow, Knizhnyj dom "LIBROKOM" Publ., 2009. 280 p.

9. Egorov V.K. Eshchyo raz ob oppozicii "svoj-chuzhoj" [Once again about the opposition "friend-foe"]. Kommunikologiya = Communicology, 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 138-154. https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2020-8-1-138-154.

10. Shopengauer A. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie [The world as will and representation]. Sobranie sochinenij v pyati tomah = Collected works in five volumes, 1992. Vol. 1. Available at: http://az.lib.ru/s/shopengauer_a/text_0040.shtml (accessed 20.08.2022).

11. Darwin Ch. The expression of emotions in man and animals. New York. D. Appleton and Company. 1899. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1227/1227-h/1227-h.htm#link 2HCH0008 (accessed 01.02.2023).

12. Freud S. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious (Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewußten). New York, Penguin, 1905. Available at: https://www.sigmund-freud.net/jokes-and-their-relation-to-the-unconscious-pdf-ebook.jsp (accessed 01.02.2023).

13. Kant I. Critique of judgment. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1987. 576 p. Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/7/77/Kant_Immanuel_Critique_of_ Judgment_1987.pdf.

14. Spencer H. On the physiology of laughter. 1859. Available at: https://wwevery-writersre-source.com/on-the-physiology-of-laughter-by-herbert-spencer/ (accessed01.02.2023).

15. Evgrafova Yu. A. Fokalizaciya kak sredstvo realizacii kogezii v ekrannom tekste (na primere polikodovyh-polimodal'nyh tekstov) [Focalization as a means of implementing cohesion in screen text (using the example of polycode-polymodal texts)]. Uchenye zapiski nacional'nogo obshchestva prikladnoj lingvistiki = Scientific Notes of the National Society of Applied Linguis-tics, 2020, no. 3(31), pp. 29-40. EDN BPIRXE.