Labor Motivation of Personnel as a Factor of Increasing the Efficiency of the Management Process in an Educational Organization

   The relevance of the manager's activities to motivate the labor behavior of personnel, to form their interest in quality work increases with changes occurring during the modernization of the education system. It is possible to effectively manage the professional activity of an employee through understanding his leading motives and stimulating his work activity. However, today there is a significant contradiction between the need to plan and develop a system of employee motivation and the secondary importance of motivation as an organization management function. The present study was devoted to identifying the leading motives of professional activity of scientific and pedagogical staff of the university in order to improve the efficiency of team management through the planning of the system of labor motivation. The article presents a theoretical analysis of the concepts of "work motivation", "motivational readiness", "innovative motivation", "internal and external factors". As a result of empirical research, it was revealed that the leading motives for teachers are internal motives. This means that scientific and pedagogical workers consciously chose their profession, they have a high interest in creative self-realization, and the desire to devote themselves to students is a priority. They demonstrate a willingness to innovate, feel satisfaction from the pedagogical process itself and the results of their own work. However, external positive motivators are also extremely important for teachers. In particular, employees are extremely sensitive to external assessments of their activities by management and colleagues, to financial incentives and incentives, flexible working hours. Thus, the motivation system of employees should be based on knowledge of their leading motives. This will allow the heads of educational institutions, even with a limited amount of organizational resources, to effectively influence labor efficiency.

1. Vihanskij O. S., Naumov A. I. Menedzhment: chelovek, strategiya, organizaciya, process [Management: person, strategy, organization, process]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2007. 168 p.

2. Rean A. A., Kolominskij Ya. L. Social'naya pedagogicheskaya psihologiya [Social pedagogical psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. 416 p.

3. Maradze L. M., Kuznecova A. A. Udovletvorennost' professional'noj deyatel'nost'yu: kriterial'no-fenomenologicheskij analiz [Satisfaction with professional activity: criterion-phenomenological analysis]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i pedagogika = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Linguistics and Pedagogics, 2012, no. 2, pp. 308–313.

4. Lepeshova E. M. Motivaciya truda v obrazovatel'nom uchrezhdenii: obshchie podhody [Motivation of work in an educational institution: general approaches]. Shkol'nyj psiholog = School Psychologist, 2007, no. 9, p. 43.

5. Bissenek N. P. Izuchenie osobennostej motivacii professional'nogo razvitiya pedagogov [Studying the features of motivation of professional development of teachers]. Upravlenie DOU = Management of preschool educational institutions, 2009, no. 7, pp. 92–95.

6. Podymova L. S., Dolinskaya L. A. Samoutverzhdenie pedagogov v innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti [Self-affirmation of teachers in innovation]. Moscow, MPGU Publ., 2014. 207 p.

7. Udalov A. S. Stimulirovanie personala [Staff incentives]. Personal Miks = Staff Mix, 2001, no. 1, p. 25.

8. Rean A. A. Psihologiya i psihodiagnostika lichnosti: Teoriya, metody issledovaniya, praktikum [Psychology and psychodiagnostics of personality: Theory, research methods, practicum]. St. Petersburg, Prajm-EVROZNAK Publ., 2006, pp. 84–86.

9. Bakuradze A. B. Motivaciya truda pedagogov [Motivation of teachers' work]. Moscow, "Sentyabr'" Publ., 2005. 192 p.

10. Komissarova T. D. Upravlenie chelovecheskimi resursami [Human resource management]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2002. 312 p.