Counter Text as a Tool for Studying Understanding
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-151X-2025-15-1-18-28
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to investigate the phenomenon of counter text from the point of view of psycholinguistic mechanisms of activity that “launches” its creation – the individual’s metalinguistic activity. The creation of a counter text (“finished product” of understanding) is considered in a complex of “events” during perception and understanding of the text as a separate stage of understanding activity.
Materials and methods. To analyze counter texts, the author used an experimental technique. The materials of the study appeared to be 55 counter texts obtained during the experiment conducted among 1st and 2nd year students of the Southwestern State University (52 participants) and teachers of the Department of Foreign Languages of the Southwestern State University (3 participants), a total of 55 people.
The results of the experiment indicate that the construction of a counter text has a deeply individual character, due to the difference in the strategies of metalinguistic activity of the participants of the experiment presented in the article, and the difference in the qualitative characteristics and properties of metalinguistic activity recorded during the analysis of counter texts. The characteristic features of metalinguistic activity are noted: paraphrasing and replacing words with synonyms or those that play the role of synonyms in the individual lexicon of the subjects; adding evaluative judgments and intermediate conclusions to the narrative canvas of counter texts; introducing abbreviated semantic blocks that are understandable to the author of the counter text, but require additional decoding; generalization of information; restructuring the original structure of the author's text; distortion of individual details of the content.
Conclusion. The counter text is a compressed fragment of the "reality" recreated by the recipient, which arose in his consciousness as a result of the influence of the author's text. The degree of discrepancy is determined, firstly, by the presence or absence of such experience in the recipient (both his own lived experience and adapted through books, etc.), and secondly, by the formation of cognitive mechanisms for processing information that make it possible to refract someone else's segment of reality and project it onto one's own reality; thirdly, the presence of a sufficient arsenal of linguistic means and skills for their immediate use. The counter text is an accessible tool for studying the individual's metalinguistic activity.
About the Author
T. V. KruzhilinaRussian Federation
Tatiana V. Kruzhilina, Candidate of Sciences (Philological), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages
Researcher ID: 738898
50 let Oktyabrya Str., 94, Kursk 305040
References
1. Belyanin V.P. Psycholinguistics. Moscow: Flinta; 2016. 415 p. (In Russ.) Russ.)
2. Zalevskaya A.A. The text and its understanding. Tver': Tver. gos. un-t, 2001. 178 p. (In
3. Zalevskaya A.A. Introduction to psycholinguistics. Moscow: Rossijsk. gos. gumanit. un-t; 2007. 558 p. (In Russ.)
4. Nesterova N. M Psycholinguistics of the text, or is there any meaning in the text? Voprosy psiholingvistiki = Questions of psycholinguistics. 2009;(9):213-219. (In Russ.). EDN LAULON.
5. Nesterova N.M. On two approaches to the problem of understanding the text: the concepts of A.A. Zalevskaya and A.I. Novikov. Voprosy psiholingvistiki = Questions of psycholinguistics. 2024;3(61):59-69. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2024-61-3-59-69. EDN JWEMBQ.
6. Gal'perin P. Ya. Psychology of thinking and the doctrine of the step-by-step formation of mental actions. In: Psihologiya kak ob"ektivnaya nauka. = Psychology as an objective science. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Institut prakticheskoj psihologii. Voronezh: NPO Modek; 1998. P. 272‒317. (In Russ.). Available at: https://psychlib.ru/inc/absid.php?absid=107896 (accessed 24.11.2024). Russ.)
7. Novikov A.I. Text semantics and its formalization. Moscow: Nauka; 1983. 215 p. (In
8. Novikov A.I., Vasil'evoj N.V., Nesterovoj N.M., Peshkovoj N.P. (eds.) The text and its semantic dominants. Moscow: Institut yazykoznaniya RAN; 2007. 224 p. (In Russ.)
9. Zhinkin N.I. About code transitions in internal speech. Moscow: Kul'tura, Akad. Proekt; 2006. P. 251-263. (In Russ.)
10. Ish-Kishor S. A date with love. (In Russ.). Available at: http://sacralis.com/biblioteka/proza/2605-svidanie_s_lubovju.html?ysclid=ls0tcuhl7u170031708 (accessed 24.11.2024).
11. Myagkova E.Yu. Modeling of the internal metalanguage in teaching understanding of a foreign language text. Word and text: a psycholinguistic approach = Word and text: a psycholinguistic approach. 2006;(6):122–130. (In Russ.)
12. Vygotskij L.S. Thinking and speech. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter; 2019. 431 p. (In Russ.)
13. Kruzhilina T.V. Understanding text in ontogenesis. Kursk; 2016. 173 p. (In Russ.)
14. Kruzhilina T.V. Text research strategies in psycholinguistics. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i pedagogika = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Linguistics and Pedagogics. 2016;6(4):71-77. (In Russ.) EDN XRGYCH.
15. Kruzhilina T.V. Features of text message comprehension by preschool children. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i pedagogika = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Linguistics and Pedagogics. 2013;3(4):16-23. (In Russ.). EDN RWVFPT.
16. Myagkova E. Yu. The study of internal grammar as a search for ways to overcome functional illiteracy. In: Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikaciya: sbornik nauchnyh statej, posvyashchennyh pamyati V.N. Teliya = Language, consciousness, communication: a collection of scientific articles dedicated to the memory of V.N. Telia. Is 53. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2016. P. 254-265. (In Russ.). DN WJFXRN.
17. Holodnaya M.A. Cognitive styles. On the nature of the individual mind. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2004. 384 p. (In Russ.)
18. Myagkova E.Yu. Language-Logic-Grammar: towards the problem of metalanguage modeling. In: Metodologiya sovremennogo yazykoznaniya: sbornik statej = Methodology of modern linguistics. Collection of articles. Moscow: Akademiya social'nogo upravleniya; 2010. P. 141-150. (In Russ.). EDN RHHEUC.
19. Myagkova E.Yu. On "formal" and "internal" grammar. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya = Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philology. 2012;(4):96-103. (In Russ.). EDN PJPYUB.
20. Frumkina R.M. Psycholinguistics. Moscow: Academia; 2001. 315 p. (In Russ.)
21. Pishchal'nikova V.A. Chapter I. Neurophysiological foundations of functional illiteracy. In: Funkcional'naya negramotnost' kak ob"ekt psiholingvistiki = Functional illiteracy as an object of psycholinguistics. Moscow: R. Valent; 2022. P. 30-51. (In Russ.). EDN GFMZYK.
22. Peshkova N. P. Semantics and meaning of the text: >, <, =, #? ( an experimental approach to theoretical problems). Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2015;(15):69-77. (In Russ.). EDN UKPLCV.
Review
For citations:
Kruzhilina T.V. Counter Text as a Tool for Studying Understanding. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Linguistics and Pedagogy. 2025;15(1):18-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-151X-2025-15-1-18-28