Socio-psychological features of interpersonal conflicts of employees of the penal system

Reforming law enforcement agencies is certainly an important stabilizing factor. The reform of law enforcement agencies, although important, cannot be the only tool for fully optimizing the moral and psychological component of the work of employees. However, despite its importance, it is not able to fully solve the problem of optimizing the moral and psychological component of official activity. Studying the features of interpersonal conflicts among employees of the penal correction system is an important and necessary step to improve the efficiency of this system and preserve the mental health of its representatives. In modern realities, there is an increase in the number of conflicts in the staff of the penitentiary system. This phenomenon is caused not only by the high level of stress and tension at work, but also by the difficult situations that employees face in the course of their professional activities.

The diversity of opinions, approaches to the performance of official duties and differences in the characters of the participants also contribute to the emergence of misunderstandings. For successful conflict resolution, it is extremely important to openly discuss emerging issues, rather than hide them. This allows you to create conditions for a constructive dialogue. Using conflict management techniques and developing communication skills can significantly improve the atmosphere in a team. The formation of an environment of mutual understanding and interaction contributes to the development of cooperation and, ultimately, increases the overall productivity of work.

Objective: to study interpersonal conflicts among employees of the penal system in order to determine the main reasons contributing to the development of conflicts. Relevance. The study of the psychology of conflicts contributes to the understanding of the main mechanisms underlying interpersonal contradictions. This knowledge, in turn, provides opportunities for creating effective strategies aimed at their resolution and mitigation of negative impact. Employees of the penal system work in conditions of increased stress, instability and risk. This can lead to increased conflicts and negatively affect the work of the team. Employees of the penal system are responsible for the safety of both prisoners and their own safety. Frequent conflicts lead to a deterioration in the psychological state of employees, an increase in stress and fatigue, as well as problems in their personal lives.

Studying the characteristics of interpersonal conflicts will help develop effective methods for their prevention and resolution, which will increase the stability and efficiency of the penal system. The empirical study examined the socio-psychological characteristics of interpersonal conflicts among employees of the penal system. At different stages of the study, the following methods were used: theoretical analysis of scientific research; organizational methods; empirical methods: observation, psychodiagnostic methods.

1. Zautorova E.V., Kevlya F.I. Characteristics of psychological well-being of employees depending on the length of service in the penal system of the Russian Federation. Vedomosti ugolovno-ispolnitelnoy sistemy = Bulletin of the penal system. 2022;(8):57–66. (In Russ).

2. Bovin B.G. Introduction. In: Psikhologicheskaya prigodnost' k sluzhbe v pravookhranitel'nykh organakh = Psychological suitability for service in law enforcement agencies. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2018. 355 p. (In Russ).

3. Nikitina T.V. Communicative training of employees of the penal system. Ugolovnoispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravleniye = Penal system: law, economics, management. 2013;(1):20. (In Russ).

4. Kiselev A.M. Specifics of development of qualities necessary for employees of the penal system for actions in a complex operational situation. Chelovek: prestupleniye i nakazaniye = Man: crime and punishment. 2014;(3):181-184. (In Russ).

5. Dikaya L.G., Krylova G.Yu. Situational and personal determinants of professional development of a professional in the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation. In: Ezhegodnik Rossiiskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva = Yearbook of the Russian Psychological Society. Moscow, 2005. P. 361-363. (In Russ).

6. Gornostaev S.V. Concept and structure of professionally important qualities. Psikhologicheskie problemy professional'noi prigodnosti i sluzhebnoi loyal'nosti sotrudnikov ugolovnoispolnitel'noi sistemy = Psychological problems of professional suitability and service loyalty of employees of the penal system. Moscow: Prospect; 2017. (In Russ).

7. Mastenbrook U. Conflict management and organization development. Moscow: INFRAM; 1996. 254 p. (In Russ).

8. Vodopyanova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Burnout syndrome: diagnosis and prevention. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg; 2019. (In Russ).

9. Vorozheikin I.E., Kibanov A.Ya., Zakharov D.K. Conflictology. Moscow: Infra-M; 2009. (In Russ).

10. Zelenkov M.Yu. Conflictology. Moscow: Dashkov and Co., 2020. (In Russ).

11. Grishina N.V. Psychology of conflict. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2018. (In Russ).

12. Gamidova G.V. Abuse of official powers by employees of the Penitentiary System as one of the causes of penitentiary conflicts. Ural'skiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy = Ural Journal of Legal Research. 2021;(1):3–11. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.34076/2658_512X_2021_1_3.

13. Yezhova O. N. Penitentiary conflictology. Samara; 2022. (In Russ).

14. Sokolov I.I. Psychological analysis of personality deformations and behavior of employees of the penal system. Moscow: Prospect; 2017. (In Russ).

15. Sobolev N.G. On the issue of behavior strategies of employees of the penal system of the Russian Federation in conflict situations. Vserossiyskiy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal sotsial'nykh i gumanitarnykh issledovaniy = All-Russian scientific and practical journal of social and humanitarian research. 2023;(1):38-43. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.46741/sgjournal.2023.8.1.006.

16. Gavrina E.E. Psychological features of organizational behavior of employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in the process of taking up a position. Ryazan, 2008. (In Russ).

17. Yelikova M.E. Interrelation of socio-psychological attitudes of a student psychologist and strategies of behavior in conflict. In: Collection of scientific papers based on the results of scientific work competitions. Novokuznetsk; 2022. (In Russ).

18. Karpov A. V. Psychology of Management. Moscow: Yurait Publishing House; 2024. (In Russ).

19. Polovinko V. S. Personnel management: a systematic approach and its implementation. Moscow: Inform-knowledge; 2002. (In Russ).

20. Potemkin P.V., Malyshev K.B., Sobolev N.G., Chirkov A.M. Characteristics of mental stability of security department employees with different terms of service in the penal system of the Russian Federation. Penitentsiarnaya nauka = Penitentiary Science. 2021;15(3):553–564. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764-2021-15-3-553-564